Get help now
  • Pages 3
  • Words 698
  • Views 474
  • Download

    Cite

    Barney
    Verified writer
    Rating
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • 5/5
    Delivery result 3 hours
    Customers reviews 204
    Hire Writer
    +123 relevant experts are online

    Hurricane Andrew 3 Essay

    Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get help now

    124 experts online

    The government agencies provide better mitigation plans than localcommunities. With their budget and plans, they will be able to shieldFlorida from future devastation. While promoting research and publicizingthe detrimental effects of hurricanes, the government can minimize the lossof lives as well as the costs of the damages following the tropical stormstrikes. For the first half of the 20th century, Florida was hit with thehardest blows by hurricanes. Locals started taking more precautions towardthis natural phenomenon, but as decades went by, nothing happened and thedamages left behind by the last tropical storm dissipated from their minds.

    Nature has not disturbed Florida until 1992 when Hurricane Andrew struck. Before Hurricane Andrew, protection against storms was minimal. Theroofers on top of the buildings offered close to no shielding. Buildingscould be blown away by strong winds, let alone hurricanes. Evacuations werenearly impossible when a storm stirred up. Florida proved to be one of themost hazard-prone areas, which is why it is extremely crucial for the stateimplement safety plans to deal with the consequences following naturaldisasters.

    There’s a list of mitigation plans that communities can use to limitthe costs dealing with disasters. Hospitals can be built in hazard prone toprovide health care for those whose lives are in danger. Businesses shouldbe discouraged from being built in hazardous zones. Certain homes andbuildings are limited to minimize damage as much as possible. The publicshould be Hurricane Andrew 4notified of the dangers of living in their homes if they live in a zonewhere hurricanes hit frequently.

    Hurricane Andrew devastated Florida’s economy tremendously in theAugust of 1992. The tropical storm cost the United States $25 – $30 billionand gained the title as the most expensive natural disaster in U. S. history.

    It destroyed nearly 63,000 homes, damaged another 100,000 homes,and left 250,000 people homeless. Much action could’ve been done to preventthis. After the hurricane, the Laboratory for Structural Mitigation orderedthat roof sheathing panels must be constructed in every home because itprotects homes from the pressure of the winds. The International HurricaneResearch Center also conjured up many disciplines to mitigate the damages. Among the disciplines involve architecture, finance, insurance, and urbanplanning. Brought to attention, The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) decided to hike up the insurance rate for hazard prone areas becausetheir argument was that people should pay the price of living in high-riskareas.

    After Hurricane Andrew, much research was done on hurricanes. Theresearch provided information on how to design homes that will best shieldthe interior. More information was given about development that lead to”hurricane loss reduction devices” and other techniques to counter thedisaster. One such example is the creation of hurricane traps that willallow homes to maximize losses of property. The Residential ConstructionMitigation Program focused their program on educating the public onhurricanes through public education programs, Hurricane Andrew 5continuously researching to develop new mitigation techniques, and toencourage homeowners to better shield their homes.

    Though all this was doneby all different programs, it is not enough to save lives and help lessenthe amount of damage done. The governor has stepped into this issue by creating trainingseminars for volunteers to prepare for potential future disasters. GovernorJeb Bush has also reinforced the importance of being for a storm by givingthe public the access to hurricane information. The public is aware of thedamages that hurricanes are capable of causing and acknowledges the routesone can take for one’s safety. They can evacuate or follow building codes.

    It’s not a matter of intruding privately owned lands; it’s a matter ofsafety and protection. Governmental agencies should have the right toregulate the use of privately owned lands in hazard prone areas. It is thegovernment’s best interest to limit costs of damages as well as protect thelives of the people. The government has the power to dramatically reducefuture hurricane damages. They have the money to fund different kinds ofprograms. They have the right to build new buildings that are able towithstand the strength of an upcoming disaster and have the ability to makeimprovements for the old buildings.

    The government can transform some ofthe buildings into instant shelters for the people. They have the means toencourage safe building codes to homeowners and contractors. Since thegovernment owns the roads and highways, they can improve them for easierevacuations when the time calls for it. .

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need custom essay sample written special for your assignment?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Hurricane Andrew 3 Essay. (2019, Mar 03). Retrieved from https://happyessays.com/hurricane-andrew-3-essay/

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy