Get help now
  • Pages 4
  • Words 811
  • Views 316
  • Download


    Verified writer
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • 4.9/5
    Delivery result 5 hours
    Customers reviews 984
    Hire Writer
    +123 relevant experts are online

    An oral presentation arguing for the legalisation Essay

    Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get help now

    124 experts online

    You’re flat on your back, on a stone cold bed – 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You have no control over your body. You cannot see, hear or speak to your loved ones. You’re dieing. Your inner workings of your body are slowly but constantly diminishing and there is no cure for your disease. Even at the best of times, life is a titanic struggle. Put yourself in this position. Imagine your life is one of pain, of suffering and of anguish. Better still, Imagine your mother, or your best friend Is In this very same position. You would ant this person to be freed of these problems.

    You would want this person to be able to painlessly drift off into a deep sleep and leave there problems on there stone bed. You would want euthanasia to be legal. Good afternoon distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. I do not come here with pithy arguments. Rather, I come before you with a plan. A plan to rid Australia of UN- necessary pain, suffering and anguish. A plan to stop our wasting of scarce medical resources on those who are Incurable and those who have no drive to live. Over the next 10 minutes, I will persuade each and every one of you that it is essential that euthanasia is legalized.

    I will do this by covering three main areas. These being the moral Justification for euthanasia, secondly the economic importance of euthanasia and finally I will discuss the basic human rights of an Individual. Ladles and gentlemen, my argument for the moral Justification of euthanasia rests on the premise of mercy and compassion, two ideals which are essential to human dignity. In most cases when a person requests euthanasia they are suffering unrelenting and continual pain, and there is no reasonable possibility of substantial covers.

    It is morally repugnant to watch another person suffer through humiliating helplessness and constant pain when one could prevent it. It Is widely considered humane to put animals that are permanently physically impaired to death, yet humans cannot currently receive the same mercy under the law, even when they request it. When we are confronted with suffering which is wholly destructive in its consequences and, as far as we can tell, could have no beneficial result, there is a moral obligation to end it. This moral Justification for euthanasia ties in with the economic wastage that are currently occurring. Ladles and gentlemen, this Is Muggy.

    Muggy was suffering from malnutrition and anorexia less than two weeks ago. Unfortunately, he was not given proper treatment for 24 hours due to there being a lack of medical resources available for treatment. Luckily, Muggy received adequate treatment Just in time. If euthanasia does not become legalized then more and more people will be forced into consuming our doctor’s time and medical resources. Next time, Muggy might not be so lucky. Ladles treatments and it is because of this that we must priorities. We must allocate these resources to those who have a good chance of recovery and a desperate want to live.

    We must legalese euthanasia. Ladies and gentlemen, we live in a country that prides itself on upholding basic human rights. Rights to personal opinions, rights to voting and rights to religious choices. Yet in the midst of these human rights, the Australian government has chosen to deprive its citizens of the most basic right known. The choice to life. How can we, as proud Australians, claim to live in a “free country”, when we are not given he right to chose to end our own lives when it becomes so unbearable. How can we settle for so many elderly Australians being forced to live a life of pain, suffering and anguish?

    Together, we need to develop, establish and integrate safe programs that allow people the right to choose their destiny. It is about time the Australian government realized the legitimacy of these arguments and the reality that so many Australians are facing. It is about time Australians had the choice to end a life of pain, suffering and anguish. So to conclude ladies and gentlemen, this argument does not rest itself on pithy homes, rather, it rests itself on the premise of mercy and compassion, two ideals which are essential to human dignity.

    It is not UN-ethical or immoral to legalese euthanasia. Rather it is immoral to give patients no option but to endure a life of pain, of suffering and of anguish. As Martin Luther King once said “l am not sure I would have wanted my children to live a life of torment and abuse, so I dared to stop it. ” Let’s not force our children to endure this same suffering if they are terminally ill without a cure, let’s give them the chance for peace and happiness, let’s give our children a choice. I dare you!

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need custom essay sample written special for your assignment?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    An oral presentation arguing for the legalisation Essay. (2018, Oct 23). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy